He was chosen as one of twenty online opinion writers for the NYT. His gene expression blog is over my head, but I often read versions distilled elsewhere.
It will be interesting to see how the NYT generates traffic for these writers. In particular, will liberals who read the NYT, and whose idea of ideological diversity is David Brooks, be steered toward the new crew of writers, some of whom are outside the range of opinion usually found at the NYT?
Actually they fired him on the very same day when Gawker made a fuss and accused him of consorting with racists.
a little late arnold, but thanks for the thoughts 😉
I guess the answer is no, flaming libs aren’t ready to stop denying science.
To them, one might as well be a Nazi eugenicist.
I’m reminded of a line from the cinematic masterpiece “Deuce Bigalow 2: European Gigolo”,
“Yeah, but figuring it out is racist! “
Well, this is awkward.
No. Congratulations are still in order!