<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Paul Ryan Represents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 09:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think he represents more the conservative version of &quot;good government&quot; wonk than intellectual, but that may be splitting hairs.

The Trumpistas it&#039;s are mistaking anything that is respectable for elitism. We&#039;ll just have to muddle through it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he represents more the conservative version of &#8220;good government&#8221; wonk than intellectual, but that may be splitting hairs.</p>
<p>The Trumpistas it&#8217;s are mistaking anything that is respectable for elitism. We&#8217;ll just have to muddle through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 22:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative intellectual? With a budget proposal that borders the absurd? When was the last time unemployment hit 2.5 percent? 
I like your contrarian take on many issues, but this one just doesn&#039;t make sense. Is Bernie Sanders an intellectual too? (A progressive one, that is).
Respectfully disappointed, 
R]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative intellectual? With a budget proposal that borders the absurd? When was the last time unemployment hit 2.5 percent?<br />
I like your contrarian take on many issues, but this one just doesn&#8217;t make sense. Is Bernie Sanders an intellectual too? (A progressive one, that is).<br />
Respectfully disappointed,<br />
R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess realistic pragmatism is too much to expect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess realistic pragmatism is too much to expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Handle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 10:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major - and perhaps the key - strength of progressivism is the ability to make right-wing ideas socially unfashionable with elites and create a perception of them being unpopular and held only by loser morons or clever fraudsters and other non-respectably characters, thus permanently placing those ideas &#039;on the fringe&#039;.  And most people want to avoid fringes.

Now, is Paul Ryan actually a conservative intellectual politician, or just a booster of Republican ideas, parroting the higher-brow justifications from the usual academic sources?  What insights have we learned from him that compare to the output of, say, a Daniel Patrick Moynihan?

&lt;a&gt;Yglesias recently wrote&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Paul Ryan is demonstrably brilliant at suckering credulous journalists into testifying to his own brilliance, but he&#039;s not much of a poker player,&quot; and I&#039;ve got to say, I have a similar impression of the man.  I&#039;m happy to be proven wrong, however.

As for what Ryan and other conservative intellectual politicians should do, the first principle must always be political survival or one is not doing the other principles any good.  And that means compromise with - and embrace and defense of - the desires and interests of the not-always-respectable or litmus-test-passing voters.  That&#039;s exactly what didn&#039;t happen on the road to Trump&#039;s nomination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major &#8211; and perhaps the key &#8211; strength of progressivism is the ability to make right-wing ideas socially unfashionable with elites and create a perception of them being unpopular and held only by loser morons or clever fraudsters and other non-respectably characters, thus permanently placing those ideas &#8216;on the fringe&#8217;.  And most people want to avoid fringes.</p>
<p>Now, is Paul Ryan actually a conservative intellectual politician, or just a booster of Republican ideas, parroting the higher-brow justifications from the usual academic sources?  What insights have we learned from him that compare to the output of, say, a Daniel Patrick Moynihan?</p>
<p><a>Yglesias recently wrote</a>, &#8220;Paul Ryan is demonstrably brilliant at suckering credulous journalists into testifying to his own brilliance, but he&#8217;s not much of a poker player,&#8221; and I&#8217;ve got to say, I have a similar impression of the man.  I&#8217;m happy to be proven wrong, however.</p>
<p>As for what Ryan and other conservative intellectual politicians should do, the first principle must always be political survival or one is not doing the other principles any good.  And that means compromise with &#8211; and embrace and defense of &#8211; the desires and interests of the not-always-respectable or litmus-test-passing voters.  That&#8217;s exactly what didn&#8217;t happen on the road to Trump&#8217;s nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 05:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the cultural traditionalists are the cause of political theater and political trolling tit-for-tat. I think it is the two party system that makes each side take increasingly pointlessly stupid positions mainly to troll the other side. Democrats just are late to figuring out their side takes equally stupid positions and over extends on them as well. To expel one faction would just shift the trolling to another issue and with less votes on your side.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the cultural traditionalists are the cause of political theater and political trolling tit-for-tat. I think it is the two party system that makes each side take increasingly pointlessly stupid positions mainly to troll the other side. Democrats just are late to figuring out their side takes equally stupid positions and over extends on them as well. To expel one faction would just shift the trolling to another issue and with less votes on your side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Gustafson</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Gustafson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 01:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the results of the last few years, the base is no longer listening to what they say and only looking at what they accomplish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the results of the last few years, the base is no longer listening to what they say and only looking at what they accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Gustafson</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Gustafson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 01:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even putting up a fight after so many promises to the base tells the base a lot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even putting up a fight after so many promises to the base tells the base a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4) Try to understand how Milton Friedman was so successful and replicate.

In the 70s, even mainstream economists thought it was natural for the government to set a wide variety of prices using price controls.  (At least, that&#039;s what I hear people say.  I was a young child then, so I don&#039;t really remember.)  By the 90s, right and left basically agreed with Friedman&#039;s economic views.  (That I do remember.)  Of course, Friedman was helped by a gifted politician communicator in Reagan.  The Left has also been helped by a gifted communicator in Obama, but their ideas are not gaining widespread acceptance, except among themselves, because the ideas themselves are so flawed.

The right confluence of conservative intellectuals and politician communicators can win over both intellectuals and non-intellectuals.  Of course, this will probably not happen in the presidential contest, but Paul Ryan could still be very influential as House Speaker.  His advantage is that he is both an intellectual and a politician so he does not necessarily need to wait for the right partner to come along.  One positive sign for Ryan is that he was able to become Speaker, and effectively leader of the Republican Party, without campaigning for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4) Try to understand how Milton Friedman was so successful and replicate.</p>
<p>In the 70s, even mainstream economists thought it was natural for the government to set a wide variety of prices using price controls.  (At least, that&#8217;s what I hear people say.  I was a young child then, so I don&#8217;t really remember.)  By the 90s, right and left basically agreed with Friedman&#8217;s economic views.  (That I do remember.)  Of course, Friedman was helped by a gifted politician communicator in Reagan.  The Left has also been helped by a gifted communicator in Obama, but their ideas are not gaining widespread acceptance, except among themselves, because the ideas themselves are so flawed.</p>
<p>The right confluence of conservative intellectuals and politician communicators can win over both intellectuals and non-intellectuals.  Of course, this will probably not happen in the presidential contest, but Paul Ryan could still be very influential as House Speaker.  His advantage is that he is both an intellectual and a politician so he does not necessarily need to wait for the right partner to come along.  One positive sign for Ryan is that he was able to become Speaker, and effectively leader of the Republican Party, without campaigning for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the same reason I hate most intellectuals!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the same reason I hate most intellectuals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom DeMeo</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/what-paul-ryan-represents/#comment-465646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom DeMeo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 23:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6883#comment-465646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he&#039;s smart, he&#039;ll realize he is in a position of real power, and he will let his accomplishments define what he represents. The reason the republican party is in the position they are is they have let the gap between their rhetoric and their actions become ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s smart, he&#8217;ll realize he is in a position of real power, and he will let his accomplishments define what he represents. The reason the republican party is in the position they are is they have let the gap between their rhetoric and their actions become ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
