<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uncle Sugar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/uncle-sugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/uncle-sugar/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/uncle-sugar/#comment-38349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Handle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=829#comment-38349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, sugar&#039;s &quot;down&quot; to 20 cents a pound from highs of nearly 30 a few years ago.  But it was in a bubble.  20 c/lb is still higher than it&#039;s been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=sugar&amp;months=360&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for all but the last four years&lt;/a&gt;.

But what&#039;s worse?  Buying up sugar on the open market, or just &lt;i&gt;giving&lt;/i&gt; the stuff to certain &quot;private&quot;, and already-subsidized, ethanol producers for half price.  Talk about your corporate welfare.  I mean, awesome for them, I guess.  Can any old business just rely on the government to deliver its inputs to it at half market price? 

The sheer breadth, depth, and multiplicity of interactions of government interventions in the economy is mindbogglingly disturbing.  Loans, subsidies, tariffs, price supports, etc.  And to what end?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sugar&#8217;s &#8220;down&#8221; to 20 cents a pound from highs of nearly 30 a few years ago.  But it was in a bubble.  20 c/lb is still higher than it&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=sugar&amp;months=360" rel="nofollow">for all but the last four years</a>.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s worse?  Buying up sugar on the open market, or just <i>giving</i> the stuff to certain &#8220;private&#8221;, and already-subsidized, ethanol producers for half price.  Talk about your corporate welfare.  I mean, awesome for them, I guess.  Can any old business just rely on the government to deliver its inputs to it at half market price? </p>
<p>The sheer breadth, depth, and multiplicity of interactions of government interventions in the economy is mindbogglingly disturbing.  Loans, subsidies, tariffs, price supports, etc.  And to what end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/uncle-sugar/#comment-37875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=829#comment-37875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that the government can give the agribusiness millions of dollars of handouts and then Obama and Congress have the audacity to complain about the sequester is galling. This is corporate welfare at its most infuriating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that the government can give the agribusiness millions of dollars of handouts and then Obama and Congress have the audacity to complain about the sequester is galling. This is corporate welfare at its most infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
