<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Null Hypothesis in Health Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-null-hypothesis-in-health-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-null-hypothesis-in-health-insurance/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-null-hypothesis-in-health-insurance/#comment-64685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nat Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=1150#comment-64685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paper is here: http://www.nber.org/oregon/old_files/oregon_hie_oneyear.pdf 
The incidental economist has evaluating the results herehttp://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The paper is here: <a href="http://www.nber.org/oregon/old_files/oregon_hie_oneyear.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nber.org/oregon/old_files/oregon_hie_oneyear.pdf</a><br />
The incidental economist has evaluating the results herehttp://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wophugus</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-null-hypothesis-in-health-insurance/#comment-64482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wophugus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 03:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=1150#comment-64482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the null hypothesis is no improvement in health outcomes, isn&#039;t a finding that depression rates dropped grounds to reject the null hypothesis?  On the one hand kind of nitpicky, but on the other hand mental health is important!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the null hypothesis is no improvement in health outcomes, isn&#8217;t a finding that depression rates dropped grounds to reject the null hypothesis?  On the one hand kind of nitpicky, but on the other hand mental health is important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
