<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lost Art of Political Dialogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pithlord</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pithlord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 00:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True, but it is also true that the 1945-1967 era was hardly peaceful or decorous in the South.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but it is also true that the 1945-1967 era was hardly peaceful or decorous in the South.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triclops</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[triclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s true, and I think, in no small part due to the unusual across the board growth in prosperity post WW2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true, and I think, in no small part due to the unusual across the board growth in prosperity post WW2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triclops</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[triclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch, that is about as efficient a destruction as I have seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, that is about as efficient a destruction as I have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triclops</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[triclops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or, whoever is winning the culture war doesn&#039;t care about niceties, and whoever is losing laments the aggressiveness of the winners. That explains the current and past situation best, IME.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, whoever is winning the culture war doesn&#8217;t care about niceties, and whoever is losing laments the aggressiveness of the winners. That explains the current and past situation best, IME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago Ribeiro</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thiago Ribeiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You disagree with a sentence or two.&quot;
 No, I disagree with every single sentence because every single sentence is a fantastic lie designed to give Stalin&#039;s Moscow Trials a run for their money. 
 For instance: &quot;Individualism, reason, law, the nation-state, and federalism were tools designed to set aside considerable space (personal, religious, and property) where we agreed to disagree.&quot;
 &quot;Federalism&quot; meant slaves, Abolitionists and post-Civil War blacks had to &quot;agree&quot; with Slavery and restrictions on Civil Rights in the South if they knew what was the best for their health. When people stopped &quot;agreeing&quot;, the USA got a Civil War (part of the political dialogue, I guess), Reconstruction, Federal troops in Little Rock and the Civil Rights Act. Conservative mythology aside, this is how &quot;States Rights&quot; became the favorite mantra of the Jim Crow crowd.
The rest of the sentence is just more self-congratulatory non-sense that can be summed up thus: &quot;Conservatives (even when they engage in stupid policies and the most vile rabble-rousing) have a monopoly of Reason and Law just because I said so&quot;.
 Reading American rightists&#039; books showed me that their main characteristic is their totalitarian conception of politics, always yearning for an idealized past America where people who disagree with them didn&#039;t exist or knew their proper place, and there were &quot;good&quot; laws in place to remind them if they ever dared to forget.
&quot;I also demand anonymity on line because I can very easily imagine liberals attacking me in my real life for my comments in a way I have trouble imagining conservatives doing.&quot;
It is a funny thing to say when the Conservative hate machine is working overtime. Well, you know what they say, &quot;I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool.&quot; By the way, in the good old times of the fine &quot;art of political dialogue&quot;, things much worse than the ones that can put a Conservative to trouble nowadays were frequently said about (or done to) Jews, Catholics, Blacks, Hispanics, Gays, Liberals and, in fact, were official policy. Thus I dare to say that it is not &quot;Civility&quot; or &quot;Reason&quot; that you miss, but the ability to attack the &quot;other&quot; with perfect impunity.
&quot;Ymmv.&quot;
Some people may have more reasons for nostalgia than others, I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You disagree with a sentence or two.&#8221;<br />
 No, I disagree with every single sentence because every single sentence is a fantastic lie designed to give Stalin&#8217;s Moscow Trials a run for their money.<br />
 For instance: &#8220;Individualism, reason, law, the nation-state, and federalism were tools designed to set aside considerable space (personal, religious, and property) where we agreed to disagree.&#8221;<br />
 &#8220;Federalism&#8221; meant slaves, Abolitionists and post-Civil War blacks had to &#8220;agree&#8221; with Slavery and restrictions on Civil Rights in the South if they knew what was the best for their health. When people stopped &#8220;agreeing&#8221;, the USA got a Civil War (part of the political dialogue, I guess), Reconstruction, Federal troops in Little Rock and the Civil Rights Act. Conservative mythology aside, this is how &#8220;States Rights&#8221; became the favorite mantra of the Jim Crow crowd.<br />
The rest of the sentence is just more self-congratulatory non-sense that can be summed up thus: &#8220;Conservatives (even when they engage in stupid policies and the most vile rabble-rousing) have a monopoly of Reason and Law just because I said so&#8221;.<br />
 Reading American rightists&#8217; books showed me that their main characteristic is their totalitarian conception of politics, always yearning for an idealized past America where people who disagree with them didn&#8217;t exist or knew their proper place, and there were &#8220;good&#8221; laws in place to remind them if they ever dared to forget.<br />
&#8220;I also demand anonymity on line because I can very easily imagine liberals attacking me in my real life for my comments in a way I have trouble imagining conservatives doing.&#8221;<br />
It is a funny thing to say when the Conservative hate machine is working overtime. Well, you know what they say, &#8220;I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool.&#8221; By the way, in the good old times of the fine &#8220;art of political dialogue&#8221;, things much worse than the ones that can put a Conservative to trouble nowadays were frequently said about (or done to) Jews, Catholics, Blacks, Hispanics, Gays, Liberals and, in fact, were official policy. Thus I dare to say that it is not &#8220;Civility&#8221; or &#8220;Reason&#8221; that you miss, but the ability to attack the &#8220;other&#8221; with perfect impunity.<br />
&#8220;Ymmv.&#8221;<br />
Some people may have more reasons for nostalgia than others, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg G</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew&#039;,

Are you suggesting some previous era was better than this one?  If so which one?  And better for who?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew&#8217;,</p>
<p>Are you suggesting some previous era was better than this one?  If so which one?  And better for who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg G</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly right djf.  

Sadly, it&#039;s the period of relative harmony after WWII that is the historical anomaly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right djf.  </p>
<p>Sadly, it&#8217;s the period of relative harmony after WWII that is the historical anomaly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, and the alleged good vibes and bipartisanship got us HERE..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and the alleged good vibes and bipartisanship got us HERE..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thiago, 

For my money, sam makes the comment of the year. You disagree with a sentence or two.

I simply can&#039;t imagine conservatives doing to university speakers what liberal groups are doing, for example.

I also demand anonymity on line because I can very easily imagine liberals attacking me in my real life for my comments in a way I have trouble imagining conservatives doing. Ymmv.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thiago, </p>
<p>For my money, sam makes the comment of the year. You disagree with a sentence or two.</p>
<p>I simply can&#8217;t imagine conservatives doing to university speakers what liberal groups are doing, for example.</p>
<p>I also demand anonymity on line because I can very easily imagine liberals attacking me in my real life for my comments in a way I have trouble imagining conservatives doing. Ymmv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-lost-art-of-political-dialogue/#comment-458222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5049#comment-458222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure public choice came out of classical liberal economics.  Oh nevermind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure public choice came out of classical liberal economics.  Oh nevermind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
