<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Clunkers Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-clunkers-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-clunkers-program/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shayne Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-clunkers-program/#comment-206556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shayne Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=2165#comment-206556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R Richard Schweitzer:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Spending funds borrowed from sources outside the economy should not be qualified as redistributing income.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Why not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R Richard Schweitzer:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Spending funds borrowed from sources outside the economy should not be qualified as redistributing income.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Richard Schweitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-clunkers-program/#comment-201772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Richard Schweitzer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=2165#comment-201772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You say:

&quot;Any government spending redistributes income. &quot;

Well, that might be true if we are to include income that may be earned or produced in future generations.

All government spending in excess of revenues collected, does not redistribute &quot;income&quot; in the strict understanding of that term. Spending funds borrowed from sources outside the economy should not be qualified as redistributing income. A case can probably be argued that funds borrowed internally, whether they come from capital accumulated through prior incomes, or come from current incomes, is a redistribution of those sources of incomes.

Beyond that the statement is too broad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say:</p>
<p>&#8220;Any government spending redistributes income. &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that might be true if we are to include income that may be earned or produced in future generations.</p>
<p>All government spending in excess of revenues collected, does not redistribute &#8220;income&#8221; in the strict understanding of that term. Spending funds borrowed from sources outside the economy should not be qualified as redistributing income. A case can probably be argued that funds borrowed internally, whether they come from capital accumulated through prior incomes, or come from current incomes, is a redistribution of those sources of incomes.</p>
<p>Beyond that the statement is too broad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kebko</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/the-clunkers-program/#comment-201759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kebko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=2165#comment-201759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting that he lists extended unemployment insurance as a stimulus program.  The data seems very clear to me that extended UI prolongs unemployment duration.  The idea that it is a short term stimulus is crazy, but I&#039;m sure there is some model somewhere that proves it created some thousands of jobs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that he lists extended unemployment insurance as a stimulus program.  The data seems very clear to me that extended UI prolongs unemployment duration.  The idea that it is a short term stimulus is crazy, but I&#8217;m sure there is some model somewhere that proves it created some thousands of jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
