<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SNEP Solution:  Alternatives to the FDA Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/snep-solution-alternatives-to-the-fda-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/snep-solution-alternatives-to-the-fda-process/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 15:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/snep-solution-alternatives-to-the-fda-process/#comment-444613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=3237#comment-444613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except they barely &quot;treated&quot; Thalidomide like Thalidomide.

I need a better name for it, but we might call it the &quot;giving the government the benefit of exaggerated hindsight of a single success due largely to luck or (in this case) a single individual making it not much to hang your policy hat on logically,&quot; fallacy.

Thalidomide basically benefitted from us waiting while other countries tried it and then the &quot;clinical trials&quot; rolled in that it was a disaster in conditions (pregnancies) that no one knew (believed) even needed to be tested until after Thalidomide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except they barely &#8220;treated&#8221; Thalidomide like Thalidomide.</p>
<p>I need a better name for it, but we might call it the &#8220;giving the government the benefit of exaggerated hindsight of a single success due largely to luck or (in this case) a single individual making it not much to hang your policy hat on logically,&#8221; fallacy.</p>
<p>Thalidomide basically benefitted from us waiting while other countries tried it and then the &#8220;clinical trials&#8221; rolled in that it was a disaster in conditions (pregnancies) that no one knew (believed) even needed to be tested until after Thalidomide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/snep-solution-alternatives-to-the-fda-process/#comment-444568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=3237#comment-444568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the proverbial snake oil was ever considered harmful, just not effective. It&#039;s more like the FDA treats every drug as Thalidomide unless it&#039;s proven otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the proverbial snake oil was ever considered harmful, just not effective. It&#8217;s more like the FDA treats every drug as Thalidomide unless it&#8217;s proven otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
