<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russ Roberts interviews Thomas Leonard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/russ-roberts-interviews-thomas-leonard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/russ-roberts-interviews-thomas-leonard/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Richard Schweitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/russ-roberts-interviews-thomas-leonard/#comment-469776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Richard Schweitzer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=8019#comment-469776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;. . . the idea of having inalienable natural rights invested in you by a Creator–the language that you find in the Declaration of Independence–Darwin seems to suggest that’s just kind of a nice fiction.&quot;

However,  the &quot;idea&quot; that one&#039;s &quot;creation&quot; (hence existence) &quot;vests&quot; one with obligations does seem more empirically &quot;factual.&quot; That all &quot;inalienable natural rights&quot; require concomitant obligations (usually of others) for their exercise or expression seems to support that view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. . . the idea of having inalienable natural rights invested in you by a Creator–the language that you find in the Declaration of Independence–Darwin seems to suggest that’s just kind of a nice fiction.&#8221;</p>
<p>However,  the &#8220;idea&#8221; that one&#8217;s &#8220;creation&#8221; (hence existence) &#8220;vests&#8221; one with obligations does seem more empirically &#8220;factual.&#8221; That all &#8220;inalienable natural rights&#8221; require concomitant obligations (usually of others) for their exercise or expression seems to support that view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
