<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Provocative Sentences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/provocative-sentences-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/provocative-sentences-3/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 14:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/provocative-sentences-3/#comment-459714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-459714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgive me for being a lazy commenter, but I have limited time.  Am I to read this as a criticism of our common practice of talking about supply and demand without talking about entrepreneurship?  Hamlet without the prince, so to speak?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for being a lazy commenter, but I have limited time.  Am I to read this as a criticism of our common practice of talking about supply and demand without talking about entrepreneurship?  Hamlet without the prince, so to speak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulJC</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/provocative-sentences-3/#comment-459668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulJC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-459668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kates seems to ignore the role of money, and of the intermediation involved in &#039;saving&#039; becoming &#039;investment&#039;, to the substantial detriment of his overall argument. It&#039;s not unreasonable that he might be correct when taking the long view, when aggregated and averaged over a period of years, but this conceals an enormous amount of economic activity and decision-making. You can take money out of an economic model, theory, or argument, but you&#039;ll have far less success taking money and its effects out of the real world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kates seems to ignore the role of money, and of the intermediation involved in &#8216;saving&#8217; becoming &#8216;investment&#8217;, to the substantial detriment of his overall argument. It&#8217;s not unreasonable that he might be correct when taking the long view, when aggregated and averaged over a period of years, but this conceals an enormous amount of economic activity and decision-making. You can take money out of an economic model, theory, or argument, but you&#8217;ll have far less success taking money and its effects out of the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
