<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monetary Offset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/monetary-offset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/monetary-offset/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/monetary-offset/#comment-123604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=1839#comment-123604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And central bank incompetence should be ignored?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And central bank incompetence should be ignored?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prakash</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/monetary-offset/#comment-123152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prakash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=1839#comment-123152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prof. Kling,

My understanding is that the market monetarists prefer some kind of a monetary rule to be followed, preferably automatically, via the usage of futures markets. In the PSST story, what is the preferred monetary policy/monetary rule?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Kling,</p>
<p>My understanding is that the market monetarists prefer some kind of a monetary rule to be followed, preferably automatically, via the usage of futures markets. In the PSST story, what is the preferred monetary policy/monetary rule?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Willman</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/monetary-offset/#comment-122947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Willman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 04:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=1839#comment-122947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A better model of thinking that &quot;out of ammunition&quot; is &quot;reached the end of the scope of influence&quot;

PSST appears to account for some of this.   Animal spirits and balance sheet limits may account for more.   But the key thing is that in the end, there&#039;s a maximum possible effect the fed, or for that matter fiscal policy, can possibly have.

I now tend to think that the Fed has a much larger problem with the limits of the scope of its influence than with having ammunition to apply to said scope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better model of thinking that &#8220;out of ammunition&#8221; is &#8220;reached the end of the scope of influence&#8221;</p>
<p>PSST appears to account for some of this.   Animal spirits and balance sheet limits may account for more.   But the key thing is that in the end, there&#8217;s a maximum possible effect the fed, or for that matter fiscal policy, can possibly have.</p>
<p>I now tend to think that the Fed has a much larger problem with the limits of the scope of its influence than with having ammunition to apply to said scope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
