<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hal Varian on Big Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/hal-varian-on-big-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/hal-varian-on-big-data/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 14:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack PQ</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/hal-varian-on-big-data/#comment-306018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack PQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=2389#comment-306018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonsense jargon aside (support vector machines??), the different methods are a fulfilling what Ed Leamer wrote about 35 years ago. You have to find a way to, first, compute all possible regressions given the data and plausible theory, and then present all possible regression results in a way to establish whether or not there is a robust and meaningful finding. This is &quot;avoid cherry-picking&quot; taken to its logical conclusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense jargon aside (support vector machines??), the different methods are a fulfilling what Ed Leamer wrote about 35 years ago. You have to find a way to, first, compute all possible regressions given the data and plausible theory, and then present all possible regression results in a way to establish whether or not there is a robust and meaningful finding. This is &#8220;avoid cherry-picking&#8221; taken to its logical conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
