<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike shupp</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike shupp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, no.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slocum</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slocum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 03:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember Stephen Glass?  Wasn&#039;t the New Republic of that era a &#039;high status&#039; publication with &#039;salience&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Stephen Glass?  Wasn&#8217;t the New Republic of that era a &#8216;high status&#8217; publication with &#8216;salience&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HSAs help the poor just fine. Unlike the government subsidies that caused the explosion in unaffordability from the moment they were pushed in in the 70s. Look it up.

And it is good to reconfirm that when it comes between democracy and vaccines you will side against democracy because you think it trolls Republicans. But we already knew that about you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HSAs help the poor just fine. Unlike the government subsidies that caused the explosion in unaffordability from the moment they were pushed in in the 70s. Look it up.</p>
<p>And it is good to reconfirm that when it comes between democracy and vaccines you will side against democracy because you think it trolls Republicans. But we already knew that about you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daublin</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daublin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can wait for higher-value comments if you want. You just no longer *have to*.

The highest-value comments are worthy of blogging, and so tend to be actual blog posts on other blogs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can wait for higher-value comments if you want. You just no longer *have to*.</p>
<p>The highest-value comments are worthy of blogging, and so tend to be actual blog posts on other blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Ratnapala</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Ratnapala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I accept&quot; not &quot;I except&quot;.  Though I suppose I am excepting too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I accept&#8221; not &#8220;I except&#8221;.  Though I suppose I am excepting too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Ratnapala</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Ratnapala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, internet comments are quick and not very &quot;loud&quot;, that is people don&#039;t pay much attention to them.   Tweets probably have a wider distribution of loudness, but I don&#039;t know much about them.

My gut instinct is to think public discourse is a bit like a feedback loop.  In this case the quick-but-soft combination is a good thing:  control systems are more stable if they have short time delays and no more amplification than is needed.  

But I except that speed is no help if the feedback has the wrong sign.  E.g. tweeters one-upping each other to display outrage would be an example of that kind of positive feedback loop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, internet comments are quick and not very &#8220;loud&#8221;, that is people don&#8217;t pay much attention to them.   Tweets probably have a wider distribution of loudness, but I don&#8217;t know much about them.</p>
<p>My gut instinct is to think public discourse is a bit like a feedback loop.  In this case the quick-but-soft combination is a good thing:  control systems are more stable if they have short time delays and no more amplification than is needed.  </p>
<p>But I except that speed is no help if the feedback has the wrong sign.  E.g. tweeters one-upping each other to display outrage would be an example of that kind of positive feedback loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you in favor of mandating all vaccines?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you in favor of mandating all vaccines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John L.</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am surely not in favor of the populist attacks on vaccines Republicans have sponsored (read LewRockwell, Newsmax, both have a new cure for cancer every week, or listen some Republican hopefuls). As for HSAs--and only them-- as health policy, it means saying &quot;Drop Dead&quot; to the poor. Republicans are wisely not openly running on the strength of this idea. Good for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surely not in favor of the populist attacks on vaccines Republicans have sponsored (read LewRockwell, Newsmax, both have a new cure for cancer every week, or listen some Republican hopefuls). As for HSAs&#8211;and only them&#8211; as health policy, it means saying &#8220;Drop Dead&#8221; to the poor. Republicans are wisely not openly running on the strength of this idea. Good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike shupp</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike shupp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent idea, but a day or even a few hours is likely enough delay for most hot-headedness to subside.  

But maybe not a perfect idea.  I&#039;ve noticed that people can get incredibly wound up emotionally just by exchanging a few emails.  You&#039;d think almost empty screens with a few lines of text would promote cold rationality, but for reason it fails.  I can recall being absolutely furious with people on various academic e-lists back in the 1990&#039;s, convinced that my justified rage would last forever ... and then regarding the same folks as friends and allies a few days later when some other tempest blew up.   And I recall being warned -- not entirely facetiously -- that people could fall in love over the internet in a couple of hours.

My suspicion is the very lack of interaction with others -- our inability to hear their voices and see their expressions -- screws up our ability to decipher their written words.  Which perhaps explains why informality has become the internet norm.  We NEED all those emojis and screwed up punctuation and misspellings to convey the nuances of our conversations.  Who knows, we may even need Friday Feline Fotos!

It&#039;s intriguing to wonder how life might have gone if back in the 1960&#039;s the communications industry had pushed video phones rather than email.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent idea, but a day or even a few hours is likely enough delay for most hot-headedness to subside.  </p>
<p>But maybe not a perfect idea.  I&#8217;ve noticed that people can get incredibly wound up emotionally just by exchanging a few emails.  You&#8217;d think almost empty screens with a few lines of text would promote cold rationality, but for reason it fails.  I can recall being absolutely furious with people on various academic e-lists back in the 1990&#8217;s, convinced that my justified rage would last forever &#8230; and then regarding the same folks as friends and allies a few days later when some other tempest blew up.   And I recall being warned &#8212; not entirely facetiously &#8212; that people could fall in love over the internet in a couple of hours.</p>
<p>My suspicion is the very lack of interaction with others &#8212; our inability to hear their voices and see their expressions &#8212; screws up our ability to decipher their written words.  Which perhaps explains why informality has become the internet norm.  We NEED all those emojis and screwed up punctuation and misspellings to convey the nuances of our conversations.  Who knows, we may even need Friday Feline Fotos!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s intriguing to wonder how life might have gone if back in the 1960&#8217;s the communications industry had pushed video phones rather than email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike shupp</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/from-the-comments/#comment-463175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike shupp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 14:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6347#comment-463175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I looked at your quote.  It&#039;s a comment about poor reporting in newspapers, not exactly the same thing as the magazines with &quot;high status&quot; or &quot;salience.&quot;  

Better reporting. please!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at your quote.  It&#8217;s a comment about poor reporting in newspapers, not exactly the same thing as the magazines with &#8220;high status&#8221; or &#8220;salience.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Better reporting. please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
