<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economics Nobel Suggestions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/economics-nobel-suggestions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/economics-nobel-suggestions/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMOT</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/economics-nobel-suggestions/#comment-452080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CMOT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=3962#comment-452080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most Econ Nobelists fall into 1 of 2 catergories: tool makers or rule breakers.  Krugman was the exeption that proves the rule - he was neither, but he said a lot of bad things about George Bush, so that  was good enough.

They&#039;ve had a run of tool makers lately, so a shift to a rule breaker may be due.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Econ Nobelists fall into 1 of 2 catergories: tool makers or rule breakers.  Krugman was the exeption that proves the rule &#8211; he was neither, but he said a lot of bad things about George Bush, so that  was good enough.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve had a run of tool makers lately, so a shift to a rule breaker may be due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
