<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did You Visit the Same Country?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/did-you-visit-the-same-country/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/did-you-visit-the-same-country/</link>
	<description>taking the most charitable view of those who disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.32</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/did-you-visit-the-same-country/#comment-466152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 07:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6962#comment-466152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it wasn&#039;t the actual losses and negative equities, but it was the wealth effect and liss aversion?

How does one know?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it wasn&#8217;t the actual losses and negative equities, but it was the wealth effect and liss aversion?</p>
<p>How does one know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/did-you-visit-the-same-country/#comment-466147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6962#comment-466147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debt leverage supports much larger swings in wealth and much more widely distributed ones which is why financial crises are worse.  Risk adverseness also weighs losses more than gains and debt can make tangible net worth negative, spurring deleveraging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debt leverage supports much larger swings in wealth and much more widely distributed ones which is why financial crises are worse.  Risk adverseness also weighs losses more than gains and debt can make tangible net worth negative, spurring deleveraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew'</title>
		<link>http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/did-you-visit-the-same-country/#comment-466141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/?p=6962#comment-466141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;while it has become fashionable to cite the importance of debt in explaining the severity of the downturn&quot;

We are a decade from the peak of the housing bubble, how long do passing fads of economics last? I don&#039;t know that it is fashionable to cite debt to explain the severity of the downturn. What does he mean by severity? There are certainly people who say that the duration of the slack recovery has to do with ongoing de-leveraging. It&#039;s also interesting that he seems to set mortgages aside as not &quot;debt&quot; and doesn&#039;t mention that the home &quot;wealth effect&quot; may have had something to do with evaporating house equity. What exactly allows house prices to rise so fast? The &quot;one variable to rule them all&quot; exercise in a system analysis is like chasing your tail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;while it has become fashionable to cite the importance of debt in explaining the severity of the downturn&#8221;</p>
<p>We are a decade from the peak of the housing bubble, how long do passing fads of economics last? I don&#8217;t know that it is fashionable to cite debt to explain the severity of the downturn. What does he mean by severity? There are certainly people who say that the duration of the slack recovery has to do with ongoing de-leveraging. It&#8217;s also interesting that he seems to set mortgages aside as not &#8220;debt&#8221; and doesn&#8217;t mention that the home &#8220;wealth effect&#8221; may have had something to do with evaporating house equity. What exactly allows house prices to rise so fast? The &#8220;one variable to rule them all&#8221; exercise in a system analysis is like chasing your tail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
